Legal Opinion

Hoffman Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 13, 1985No. 118-84CPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

This direct access contract case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s opposition thereto. Defendant maintains, and plaintiff contests, that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that defendant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. While plaintiff was performing the work set out in the contract at issue, defendant issued several change orders. Plaintiff completed the change order work and submitted cost proposals thereon. The parties ostensibly negotiated over the cost proposals and agreed on ultimate amounts set…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Paragon Energy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Tecom, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Transamerica Insurance Corporation, Inc., for and on Behalf of Stroup Sheet Metal Works v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Hardwick Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Modeer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API