Legal Opinion

Yaist v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 29, 1981No. 214-77PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

This just compensation case, tried before former Trial Judge Browne, concerns the title to some property located in the Florida Everglades. The trial judge ruled that the plaintiffs property had been taken and that compensation was owing in an amount to be determined in a separate *283trial. We agree with that determination but for somewhat different reasons.1

I

Both the United States and the plaintiff, Clyde R. Yaist, claim title to the same property through purchase, and the merits of the case turn on the recordation-notice law of Florida. In 1968, Olson Florida Realty Company (Olson or Olson…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Dominic Eyherabide, Jean M. Eyherabide, Raymond Castanchoa and Marie Castanchoa v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Sapp v. WarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Yuba Goldfields, Inc. And Placer Service Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Del-Rio Drilling Programs Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Chevy Chase Land Co. of Montgomery County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API