Legal Opinion
United States v. C. M. Lane Lifeboat Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 22, 1938No. 7497PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order permitting Walter J. Krolman to intervene as an interested party defendant, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 24 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
The United States of America, in July 1929, entered into various contracts with the defendant, C. M. Lane Lifeboat Company, Inc., in which the Government agreed to purchase certain lifeboats from that defendant. The other defendant, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, executed and issued performance bonds in favor of the Government for the manufacture of…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Harry J. Stadin v. Union Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.