Legal Opinion
Penda Corporation (Now Trienda Corporation) v. The United States, and Cadillac Products, Inc., Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 22, 1994No. 94-5035PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Third-party defendant, Cadillac Products, Inc., appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims holding that the claims of Penda Corporation’s patent were not invalid and that the U.S. Government used the invention set forth in Penda’s patent without license or lawful right. Penda Corp. v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 533 (1993). The Government, Cadillac’s indemni-tee, has withdrawn its appeal of this case. Because Cadillac lacks the requisite standing to appeal independently, we dismiss Cadillac’s appeal for lack of our jurisdiction.
I
On July 20, 1988,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., Mary Kicklighter v. Nails by Jannee, Inc., and Third-Party v. Kay-See Dental Manufacturing Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Intellectual Property Development, Inc. v. Tci Cablevision of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- PODS, Inc. v. Porta Stor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- SkyHawke Technologies, LLC v. Deca International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.