Legal Opinion
Aldridge v. Billips
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided March 18, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-0172-HPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL, District Judge.
This is an action for odometer fraud, brought under the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1981-1991 (1982). Jurisdiction is proper under 15 U.S.C. § 1989. The plaintiff has also alleged a violation of Va. Code § 46.1-15.1 (1986), and seeks treble damages and attorney fees under Va.Code § 46.1-15.3 and 15 U.S.C. § 1989. The plaintiff, William K. Aldridge, has filed for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Of course, this court must assess the evidence submitted in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Daniel Norman Ryan v. E. W. Edwards, Jr., Tappahannock Ford, Inc., John C. Duval, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Jenny Nieto, A/K/A Jenny Nieto Soto v. Bill Pence, Individually and D/B/A Import Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Jones v. Fenton Ford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Suiter v. Mitchell Motor Coach Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Haynes v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Stepp v. DuffyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Compton v. Altavista Motors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
- Oettinger v. Lakeview Motors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.