Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Manning
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1990No. Nos. 89-3168, 89-3185PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
This action arises from plaintiffs’, Joseph E. Haynes and Elaine Louise Haynes, purchase of a used Ford station wagon. The facts of this case are set forth in a published opinion of the district court and will not be repeated here. See Haynes v. Manning, 717 F.Supp. 730 (D.Kan.1989). Mr. and Mrs. Haynes sued all prior owners of the vehicle, except the original dealership which sold the car, for common law fraud, breach of warranty, and violation of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Sav*452ings Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1981-1991 (federal odometer statute). Mr. and Mrs. Haynes alleged the car had…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Liquid Air Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Molo Oil Co. v. River City Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Suiter v. Mitchell Motor Coach Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Regency Nissan, Inc. v. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- DeLong v. Hilltop Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.