Legal Opinion
Mazama Timber Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 24, 1984No. 444-81CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Judge:
This case comes before the court on motions for summary judgment. Jurisdiction is based on 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-13.
*88 Factual Background
On August 20, 1974 Mazama Timber Products, Inc. (Mazama) was awarded the Rush Creek timber sale contract in the Willamette National Forest, Blue River District, by the United States Forest Service. The contract provided that, in connection with the timber sale, plaintiff would construct roads according to Forest Service specifications. Shortly after construction began, plaintiff encountered difficulties regarding subsurface conditions. On June…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Applied Companies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.