Legal Opinion

Applied Companies v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 1997No. 95-639CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Senior Judge:

This matter is before the court on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Applied Companies (Applied), seeks payment of approximately $1.9 million withheld from a settlement agreement between defendant and Applied on an ah’ conditioning contract. This withholding represented the satisfaction by defendant of Applied’s prior indebtedness to defendant, resulting from admitted erroneous overpayments to Applied, on a different air conditioning contract. The issue before the court, as framed by the pleadings, is whether defendant’s offset was a breach of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Becho, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Applied Companies v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Glenn Defense Marine (Asia) PTE, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Atlantic Diving Supply, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Hercules Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API