Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending in this Wmsiar-related1 case are plaintiff Local Oklahoma Bank’s2 motion for summary judgment on damages and defendant United States’ cross-motion for summary judgment. Oral argument was held November 5, 2003. For the reasons set out below, both parties’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
The background facts giving rise to this litigation can be found in Local America Bank of Tulsa v. United States, 52 Fed.Cl. 184 (2002) (“Local I). Familiarity with that opinion is presumed. In Local I, the court held that the government was liable for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hanover Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joseph M. McKenney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Radman v. Flanders Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Southern Building Services, Inc. v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
- Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022