Legal Opinion

Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 26, 2004No. 96-584CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending in this Wmsiar-related1 case are plaintiff Local Oklahoma Bank’s2 motion for summary judgment on damages and defendant United States’ cross-motion for summary judgment. Oral argument was held November 5, 2003. For the reasons set out below, both parties’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

The background facts giving rise to this litigation can be found in Local America Bank of Tulsa v. United States, 52 Fed.Cl. 184 (2002) (“Local I). Familiarity with that opinion is presumed. In Local I, the court held that the government was liable for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Hanover Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph M. McKenney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Radman v. Flanders Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  3. Local Oklahoma Bank, N.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Southern Building Services, Inc. v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  5. Health Republic Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API