Legal Opinion
C.B.C. Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 5, 1991No. 650-89CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending are defendant’s motion to dismiss Count XII of plaintiff’s amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and defendant’s motion to quash subpoenas. In its motion to dismiss, defendant asserts that Count XII sounds in tort, rather than in contract, and thus Count XII is not within the jurisdiction of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (1988). Further, defendant argues that dismissal of Count XII is warranted because the damages sought under that Count include attorney’s fees and other consequential damages that cannot be awarded in this case. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Emily Malone D/B/A Precision Cabinet Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Travis T. Womack, Jr. And John R. Vorhies, Formerly Partners of Petroleum Ownership Map Company (A Dissolved Partnership) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Edward R. Fountain v. The United States and Redevelopment Land AgencyUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Solaria Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ford Motor Co. v. Obsolete Ford Parts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Henrichs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.