Legal Opinion

Lacey v. Bertone

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1952No. Civ. 14816PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appeals from two orders of the superior court, one denying plaintiff a new trial but reopening the case for further proceedings and amending certain findings and portions of the interlocutory judgment; the other, denying defendant’s motion to correct the first order.

Question Presented

Fundamentally the question is whether under the circumstances of this case, after an interlocutory judgment is entered, a judge to whom the case is referred for an accounting, but who did not try the case originally, may change or modify the prior findings and decree.

Record

The action was one for specific…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. McAllen v. SouzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. City of Long Beach v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tilem v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. People v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1989
  4. David v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Dixon v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API