Legal Opinion
Tilem v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1983No. Civ. 64576PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, Acting P. J.
In February of 1978, the City of Los Angeles (City) filed an action in eminent domain as to a portion of two contiguous parcels of real property owned by Joseph Tilem (Tilem). Tilem was not served until June of that year.
Meanwhile, in June of 1978, Tilem filed an action against the City for inverse condemnation and damages. The two actions were subsequently consolidated, but just a month before trial, the City abandoned its action and the matter was tried on Tilem’s complaint.
The judgment which was entered awarded Tilem some, but not all, of the damages and costs…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Ripon v. SweetinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Rose v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.