Legal Opinion

Lacey v. Bertone

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1949No. S. F. 17621, 17715, 17722PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Lacey entered into a contract to purchase four apartment houses from Bertone. Numerous disputes arose between the parties,as to the terms and performance of the agreement, and .Lacey brought this action for specific performance and declaratory relief. Bertone filed a. cross-complaint seeking cancellation of the contract together with damages and an accounting of rents collected by Lacey while he was in possession. After trial and submission of the action, but before judgment, Bertone obtained an injunction pendente lite restraining Lacey from collecting rentals and from interfering with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston & South Riverside Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Tate v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Farrar v. McCormickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API