Legal Opinion

City of Long Beach v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1933No. Docket Nos. 8009, 8008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.—This

This action was brought by the City of Long Beach, under the “Street Opening Act of 1903”, to condemn for the public use a strip of land approximately 60 feet wide, extending from the intersection of Anaheim Street and American Avenue in Long Beach to the south line of Willow Street, where it intersects American Avenue, and used by defendant Pacific Electric Railway Company as a portion of its private right of way between the cities of Long Beach and Los Angeles. The length of such strip, including street intersections, involved in the Wright case is 5,370 feet, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In Re Guardianship of the Person & Estate of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Worden v. AlexanderMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. United States v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
  3. Anderson v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bodine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Parking Authority v. NicovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API