Legal Opinion
City of Dover v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1933No. 23800PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
The primary question in this case is whether or not the Public Utilities Commission erred in its order of August 31, 1932, when it rejected the petition of plaintiffs in error for a rehearing of the order made July 26, 1932.
Plaintiffs in error claim that they had no notice of the order made July 26, 1932. If they had no notice, they were in time with their application for a rehearing. If they had the notice required by law, then they were out of time, under either Section 543 or 614-43, General Code.
A complete statement of fact is made in this case, as it was necessary so to do in order to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travis v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Automobile MacHine Co. v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Tiffin v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Red Eagle Bus Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Allnet Communications Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommisssionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Gallo Displays, Inc. v. Cleveland Public PowerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Warner v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.