Legal Opinion

Travis v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1931No. 22598, 22599 and 22629PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

These proceedings in error are brought to review a proceeding known before the Public Utilities Commission as cause No. 6377, in which it was sought to obtain consent and authority of the commission to abandon all freight and passenger service of the electric railway lines of the Scioto Valley Bailway & Power Company. The application was heard by the commission, and on September 13,1930, the company was authorized to discontinue and abandon its service, the order to become effective October 1, 1930.

Within the time limited, applications for rehearing were filed by E. J. Travis and the Ohio…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Tiffin v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. Maddox (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Grover v. Eli Lilly And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API