Warner v. Ohio Edison Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Counsel for the administratrix contends that an application for rehearing was not a prerequisite to an appeal to this court, since the order of the commission was effective forthwith and, therefore, neither Section 543 nor Section 614-43, General Code, applies.
Such counsel admits that Section 543, General Code, makes the filing of an application for rehearing, before the effective date of- an order, a condition precedent to the right of appeal, but insists that the entry of dismissal of the complaint was effective on the date of the order of the commission and it was impossible to file an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Travis v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Dayton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Dover v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Superior Distributing Co. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Tiffin v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Bobb v. MarchantOhio Supreme Court · 1984