Legal Opinion
Allnet Communications Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commisssion
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 1987No. 86-455PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue before this court in this case is whether the PUCO’s dismissal of Allnet’s complaint was reasonable and lawful. Allnet contends that: (1) its complaint was properly brought under R.C. 4905.26, (2) the PUCO unreasonably and unlawfully failed to find that Allnet had stated “reasonable grounds for complaint” and to order a hearing, and (3) the dismissal of its complaint deprived Allnet of its property without due process of law.
R.C. 4905.26 provides as follows:
“Upon complaint in writing against any public utility by any person, firm, or corporation, or upon the initiative or complaint…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Western Reserve Transit Authority v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Dover v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Parma v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Tongren v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- In re Comm. Rev. of the Capacity Charges of Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Atwood Resources, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.