Legal Opinion
Gallo Displays, Inc. v. Cleveland Public Power
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1992No. 61876PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John V. Corrigan, Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants, four employers, businesses and property owners (collectively “appellants”), appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their verified complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to R.C. 4903.12 and 4906.12. 1 Appellants filed a complaint for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against defendants-appellees, Cleveland Public Power (“CPP”), the city of Cleveland (“city”), the Ohio Power Siting Board (“OPSB”), a legal entity part of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO”), and the Cleveland Electric Illuminating…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Marketing Research Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Kohli v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. KiroffOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Delost v. First Energy Corp., 07 Ma 194 (6-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Toledo v. Toledo Edison Co.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 2000