Legal Opinion
East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1940No. 27494, 27505 and 27506PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
It is contended by counsel for the city of Cleveland that Section 614-46, General Code, as applied to the facts of this case, and the action of the commission thereunder are unconstitutional.
Constitutionality of Appeal Statutes.
Counsel for the gas company urge that a consideration of the constitutional question^ presented in the brief of the city is precluded by reason of the fact that such questions were not raised before the commission and are not referred to or stated in the application for rehearing before the commission. In support of that position, Section 543, General…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland City Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Columbus Gas & Fuel Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Ohio Utilities Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Marietta v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ohio Power Co. v. Village of AtticaOhio Supreme Court · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.