Legal Opinion
Bingham v. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1994No. 89-CV-880, 89-CV-881, 89-CV-1141 and 89-CV-1112PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Joan Bingham and PFP, Inc. (PFP) appeal from a judgment against them, jointly and severally, in favor of appellee, Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc. 1 (GMK) for $74,195.48, as damages for breach of contract following a non-jury trial. The dispute arose out of GMK’s unsuccessful efforts to collect from appellants sums claimed under a contract with PFP for advertising and marketing services rendered by GMK associated with launching The Washington Weekly (WW), a newspaper originated by appellants and others. The trial court found that Washington Weekly…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bud Antle, Inc. v. Eastern Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Vuitch v. FurrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Diamond Chemical Co. v. Atofina Chemicals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. HazardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Estate of Raleigh v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Stockard v. MossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- McWILLIAMS BALLARD v. BROADWAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.