Bud Antle, Inc. v. Eastern Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PITTMAN, District Judge.
The appellant, Eastern Foods, Inc. (Eastern), appeals from a jury verdict in which it was held liable under the theory of de facto merger for a debt on open account owed by B & B Produce Processors, Inc. (B & B) to the plaintiff-appellee Bud Antle, Inc. (Bud Antle). Eastern contends that the district court erred in its refusal to direct a verdict in its favor on the de facto merger count and in its charge to the jury on the de facto merger doctrine. This court agrees and must reverse the district court’s judgment.
I. Factual Background
The plaintiff-appellee Bud Antle,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Elbie Mozingo, Cross-Appellee v. Correct Manufacturing Corporation and G.W. Way, Correct Manufacturing Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Raymond Leannais and Catherine Leannais v. Cincinnati, Incorporated and Cincinnati-Forte Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- McKee v. Harris-Seybold Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Vernon v. SchusterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Patin v. Thoroughbred Power Boats Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Cargo Partner Ag v. Albatrans, Inc. And Chase, Leavitt (Customhouse Brokers) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.