Legal Opinion
Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. Hazard
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 1998No. Civil Action 96-1079 SSHPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction submitted by defendants Colleen Coffman (“Colleen”) and Coffman Specialties, Inc. (“Specialties”); a motion to transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) submitted by defendants James Coffman (“James”), Coffman Construction, Inc. (“Construction”), and R.E. Hazard, Jr., a California limited partnership (“Hazard”); plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim; and related' pleadings. 1 The Court defers its consideration of the motion to dismiss for lack of personal…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- The Wilderness Society v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Diamond Chemical Co. v. Atofina Chemicals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.