Legal Opinion

Crook v. Mortenson-Neal

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1986No. S-951PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

NGC Investment and Development, Inc., d/b/a Window Supply Co., three of its shareholders and its bonding company (hereafter referred to collectively as NGC) appeal from a superior court judgment awarding plaintiff Mortonson-Neal Joint Venture (M-N) $39,745 on M-N's action to enforce NGC’s subcontract bid on glass, windows, and doors for a hospital in Homer. The court ruled that the doctrine of promissory estoppel required enforcement of NGC’s bid. M-N was also awarded $15,000 in attorney’s fees, an award which exceeded the Civil Rule 82(a) schedule and represented 80% of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Exxon Corp. v. BurglinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API