Legal Opinion
Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1978No. 3211PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINO WITZ, Justice.
Appellants, ten former employees of ap-pfellee Consolidated Utilities, Ltd., filed a complaint in the superior court seeking past due wages based on an agreement allegedly entered into by their union, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1547, and Consolidated Utilities. After discovering that the collective bargaining agreement had not been executed, appellants filed an amended complaint seeking retroactive pay based on the unexecuted agreement, the terms of which, they alleged, were “operative and dependent” on only one condition, that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Rabouin v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- KTVB, INC. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.