Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
In this case, we consider whether an out-of-state plaintiff may be statutorily required to post a bond for anticipated costs and attorney fees as a condition of maintaining suit in an Alaska court. The statutory requirement is challenged on a variety of constitutional grounds.1
We hold that the statute violates equal protection of law under the Alaska Constitution because it unreasonably restricts nonresident access to Alaska courts.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Robert Patrick resided in Alaska from 1981 to 1986. During that time he leased a truck to Lynden…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Williams v. Illinois State Scholarship CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Departments of Transportation & Labor v. Enserch Alaska Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.