Haile v. Smith
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
Action of ejectment. Judgment went for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment upon the judgment-roll, which includes a hill of exceptions.
The case was here once before (Haile v. Smith, 113 Cal. 656), but nothing was then decided that is controlling or important in the present appeal. It is averred in the complaint that on September 24, 1891, plaintiff was the owner and in possession of the land here involved; that on said day he and defendant entered into a written contract for the sale of the land by the former to the latter for three hundred and fifty dollars—one hundred dollars…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Worley v. NethercottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Haile v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Rhorer v. BilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Walker v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Christal v. Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Garvey v. LashellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Snyder v. BetschArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.