Haile v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. F. B. Ogden, Judge, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Ejectment.
The plaintiff alleges that on the 24th of September, 1891, he was the owner in fee of a certain lot of land in Alameda, and that, on that day, he entered into an agreement with the defendant for the conveyance of the land to him upon certain terms therein expressed. By the terms of the agreement, which is set forth at length in the complaint, the defendant agreed to pay for the land three hundred and fifty dollars, one hundred dollars at its execution, one hundred dollars before January 1,1892, and the balance, one hundred and fifty dollars, on or before January 1, 1893. The time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Newton v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hannan v. McNickleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Scott v. GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Berry v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Leet v. ArmbrusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.