Rhorer v. Bila
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— On the eighteenth day of February, 1887, the plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the defendant Bila, by the terms of which they agreed to sell and he agreed to buy the land in controversy for the sum of $3,375. One dollar of the purchase price was paid at the time of the execution of the agreement, and the balance ($3,374) was to be paid “as soon as said second party shall receive the second payment on a certain contract made between Frank P. Firey, Charles French, and George Bhorer, parties of the first part, and Augustin Bila, party of the second part.” On the 26th of May, 1887, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kirtz v. . PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Abbott v. AllenNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Cooper v. PenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Verbeck v. ClymerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Gervaise v. BrookinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Worley v. NethercottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hill v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Allen v. ChatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.