Callahan v. Federal Kemper Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from an order and judgment below reversing an order of the arbitrators and entering judgment in favor of appellee Federal Kemper Insurance Company and against appellant Daniel Callahan for excess wage loss benefits. Appellant raises the following issue on appeal:
I. Whether an exclusion in an automobile insurance policy stating that coverage does not extend to one sustaining injury as a direct result of loading or unloading a motor vehicle is valid under the terms of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.
For the following reasons, we agree that the policy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Roach v. Port Auth. of Allegheny Cty.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Geisler v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Omodio v. Aetna Life & CasualtySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Dorohovich v. West American InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Danko v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Berger v. RinaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Huber v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.