Gardner v. San Gabriel Valley Bank
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Frank James, Craig & Wood, and Volney H. Craig, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action to quiet plaintiffs’ title to an easement, and to restrain defendant from interfering with the use by plaintiffs and their tenants of a stairway in the rear of defendant’s building, and the maintenance by said tenants of their professional and business signs in the passageway and entrance to said stairway, such right being claimed under an easement alleged to have been created by deed.
Judgment was for defendant and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
From the findings it appears that during the year 1886 one Chas. A. Gardner, who was the owner of a lot numbered 1 on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Oregon Home Builders v. Montgomery Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Nay v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Tusi v. JacobsenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.