Legal Opinion

Mills v. Gronning

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1978No. 15621, 15622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

These two consolidated cases involve appeals from the Board of Review affirming decisions of the Appeals Referee. The referee denied claimants unemployment compensation for the period in which claimants were receiving, had received, or were entitled to receive remuneration in the form of accrued vacation pay. The decisions of the Board of Review are affirmed. All references are to U.C.A., 1953, as amended.

Each of the claimants was employed by Kennecott Copper Corporation, and each was a member of or worked under a collective bargaining agreement negotiated by a labor union.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bunny's Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McKinley v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Olof Nelson Const. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Denby v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Budd Co. v. MercerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Allen v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Green v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Donais v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API