Legal Opinion
Electrical Wholesalers, Inc. v. M.J.B. Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 23, 2007No. AC 26757PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the named parties had a contract for the sale of certain real property that would entitle the plaintiffs to equitable relief. We conclude that the trial court properly determined that there was no meeting of the minds as to the sale of the land and no other basis for awarding equitable relief, and, accordingly, affirm the court’s judgment in favor of the defendant landowner.
The plaintiffs, Electrical Wholesalers, Inc., and its principals, Arthur Namerow and Robert Namerow, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Broadnax v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Fortier v. Newington Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sovereign Bank v. LicataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Stewart v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Tsionis v. MartensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- City of Waterbury v. PHOENIX SOIL, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Rosenblit v. LascheverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.