Legal Opinion
Tsionis v. Martens
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 18, 2009No. AC 29835PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The plaintiffs, Sofia Tsionis and John Tsionis, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Richard Martens. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that (1) the court improperly determined that a contract existed between the parties and (2) in the alternative, if a contract did exist, then the court improperly determined that the contract was not terminated under the mortgage contingency clause. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history were found by the court in its memorandum of decision. The defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Aquarion Water Co. v. Beck Law Products & Forms, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Electrical Wholesalers, Inc. v. M.J.B. Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Torgerson v. KennyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Misata v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Reid v. LandsbergerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Milford Bank v. Phoenix Contracting Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Medical Device Solutions, LLC v. AferzonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Computer Reporting Services, LLC v. Lovejoy & Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.