Legal Opinion

Stewart v. King

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 11, 2010No. AC 30736PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The plaintiff, Raymond Stewart, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the defendants, Colleen King and Cecil King. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) failed to impose a resulting trust in his favor, (2) failed to find that the defendants were unjustly enriched at his expense, (3) failed to find that he was entitled to damages on the theory of quantum meruit and (4) denied his request for an order allowing him to reenter the defendants’ real property and to retrieve his personalty. We affirm the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. News America Marketing In-Store, Inc. v. MarquisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. News America Marketing In-Store, Inc. v. MarquisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Saradjian v. SaradjianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. PARNOFF v. MooneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  2. Breen v. JudgeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Downing v. DragoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Town of Stratford v. CastaterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Waterview Site Service, Inc. v. Pay Day, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API