Brady v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Bespondents own, and occupy as a residence, property across the street from and directly facing the electric substation of the appellant city, situated on block 103, Second School Land Addition to Tacoma. Transmission wires bring to this sub station a voltage of one hundred and ten thousand, where it is stepped down by means of transformers for distribution and use in the city. It is conceded that the construction and equipment of the substation is standard throughout, and it is not contended that it is negligently operated in any particular.
■ Respondents, as plaintiffs, prosecuted the action…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Chelan Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Bartel v. Ridgefield Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- Ferry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- McCullough v. Interstate Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Fix v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Cent. Puget Sound Reg'l Transit Auth. v. WR-Sri 120th N. LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- City of Yakima v. DahlinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.