Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Interstate Power & Light Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1931No. 23100. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to enjoin the defendant from erecting a high tension power line consisting of poles and wires along the side of a highway, on either side of which the plaintiffs own the abutting land. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment dismissing- the action, from which the plaintiffs appeal. •

By deed dated April 12, 1909, the appellants com veyed a strip sixty feet wide through the land which they then owned, and which they now own, as a “ right of way for a road.” In a subsequent clause in the same instrument, the road was referred to as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. Chelan Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Como v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Chelan Electric Co. v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Keokuk Junction Railway Co. v. IES Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Box L Corp. v. Teton County ex rel. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API