Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1916No. 12993PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered April 8, 1915, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action in tort, tried to the court and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action by George Jacobs and Theresa Jacobs, his wife, against the city of Seattle for dam*172ages to their residence property by reason of the construction and operation on an adjoining lot of an incinerator for the purpose of burning and destroying city garbage. The appeal is based upon the alleged error of the court in sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, and in entering judgment dismissing the action on plaintiffs’ refusal to amend.

The respondent interposes a motion to dismiss the appeal because the record does not disclose the opening statement made by counsel for appellants.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Sammons v. . City of GloversvilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Brayton v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Steele v. Queen City Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API