Barrett v. Stanislaus County Employees Retirement Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARTIN, J.
—Plaintiffs and defendants each appeal from an order of the Stanislaus County Superior Court striking return to peremptory writ of mandate filed February 12, 1985. The appeal and cross-appeal arise from plaintiff-employees’ efforts to compel the defendant retirement board to reclassify them from “miscellaneous” status to “safety member” status under the Stanislaus County retirement plan.
Facts
A. Prior Appeal
Plaintiffs are 21 individuals employed by the sheriff’s department of Stanislaus County as work program supervisors, head work program supervisors, and chief work program…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Haywood v. American River Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hudson v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION ETC.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Khan v. Los Angeles City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.