Legal Opinion
People v. Shuey
California Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1975No. Crim. 18252PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Defendants Paul Shuey (Paul) and Vicki Shuey (Vicki) were charged in a three-count information with possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530), possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530.5) and possession of amphetamines (Health & Saf. Code, § 11910).
On December 27, 1971, Officer Fisk of the Los Angeles Police Department and two fellow officers went to defendants’ home to investigate suspected narcotics activity. Five days earlier Fisk had been told by an unnamed informant that an individual named Paul had five “lids” of marijuana at the Shuey…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. GhentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.