Legal Opinion

Robinson-Smith v. Government Employees Insurance

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 1, 2004No. CIV.A. 01-1340 PLFPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The Court heard oral argument on the motions on May 19, 2004. Upon consideration of the parties’ motions for summary judgment, the oppositions, the replies, and the arguments of counsel, the Court concludes that plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability should be granted and defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be denied.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Posture of the Case

Plaintiffs allege that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smidt v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. Roe-Midgett v. CC Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Raper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. Robinson-Smith v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API