Legal Opinion
Roe-Midgett v. CC Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 4, 2008No. 18-2337PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Paula Roe-Midgett and Paul Decker sued their employer CC Services, Inc. (“CCS”) for overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1). CCS contracts with insurance companies to provide claims processing services for auto, home, commercial, and farm policies. Roe-Midgett and Decker were employed as claims adjusters at different levels of CCS’s claims-processing hierarchy. Suing individually and on behalf of four classes of claims adjusters, the plaintiffs contended that CCS improperly classified them as administrative employees…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Randy Smith, Victoria Guerrero, Ann Weaver, and Elbert Lee Reeves v. Northeastern Illinois University and Gerald LeenheerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Haywood v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Frank DuranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- McConnell v. McKillipDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2008
- Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Matthew Dewan v. M-I, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Amendola v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.