Legal Opinion

Robinson-Smith v. Government Employees Insurance

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 5, 2010No. 08-7146, 08-7147PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Government Employees Insurance Corporation, better known as GEICO, underwrites, sells and services insurance policies covering automobiles and other property. Jerome Robinson-Smith, Christine Lindsay and Robert McGruder, the named plaintiffs in the two consolidated cases on appeal, worked for GEICO as “auto damage adjusters.” 1 They sued GEICO for overtime benefits they claim they are owed under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seg., which ordinarily requires employers…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Captain Stewart W. Beckett v. Air Line Pilots AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Shockley v. City of Newport NewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. Hutchins v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cannon v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  2. Samuel Calderon v. GEICO General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. Vasilios Zannikos v. Oil Inspections (U.S.A.), IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Driscoll v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  5. Benton v. Laborers' Joint Training FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API