Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Gering

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), entered February 24, 1995, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The law is well settled that an action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed (see, Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87; Tal-Spons Corp. v Nurnberg, 213 AD2d 395; Johnston v Raskin, 193 AD2d 786). Similarly, a cause of action to recover damages…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of MontrealNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Weiss v. ManfrediNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Tal-Spons Corp. v. NurnbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. LebitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Goicoechea v. Law Offices of KihlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Kuritzky v. Sirlin & SirlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Mohamed v. Donald J. Nolan, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. Garden City Imaging Center v. Lawrence & Walsh, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API