Legal Opinion
Glamm v. Allen
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1982PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jasen, J.
We are asked on this appeal to determine the proper method of computing the Statute of Limitations period in an action for malpractice against the estate of a deceased attorney.
Plaintiff, Richard Glamm, was injured on April 26,1969 while voluntarily assisting regular firemen in the City of Amsterdam Fire Department to extinguish a fire. His injuries required extensive hospitalizations and left him partially disabled. While Glamm was hospitalized, members of his family contacted attorney Reinhart to determine if he could recover for his injuries from the City of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Glamm v. City of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Weiss v. ManfrediNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Williamson v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.