Goicoechea v. Law Offices of Kihl
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice and breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated November 15, 1995, as granted the defendant Stuart R. Kramer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
*508The law is well settled that an action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed (see, Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 93; Boyd v Gering, Gross & Gross, 226…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of MontrealNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Weiss v. ManfrediNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Tal-Spons Corp. v. NurnbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Boyd v. GeringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Muro-Light v. FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Daniels v. LebitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Lindsay v. Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Piliero v. Adler & StavrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Julian v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.