Siegel v. Kranis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHopkins, J.
The action is in malpractice against an attorney. Plaintiffs’ complaint, consisting of two causes, has been dismissed as barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 5). This appeal challenges the. correctness of the determination.
The plaintiffs Moe Siegel and Ethel Siegel are husband and wife and the plaintiff Burton Siegel is their son. On February 15, 1960 an automobile operated by Moe Siegel, in which Ethel and Burton Siegel were passengers, collided with an automobile operated by Roland Rouse and owned by Fred Battles. According to the complaint, the accident was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bland v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Conklin v. DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- McLellan v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Byrnes v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.