Legal Opinion
Garden City Imaging Center v. Lawrence & Walsh, P. C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated March 28, 1996, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it is barred by the Statute of Limitations and denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The law is well settled that an action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed (see, Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87; Tal-Spons Corp.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ely-Cruikshank Co. v. Bank of MontrealNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Weiss v. ManfrediNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Tal-Spons Corp. v. NurnbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Boyd v. GeringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Piliero v. Adler & StavrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Carranza v. PrinzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Dil v. Russo, Garguilo & FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999