Whipple v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. He argues that the post-conviction court committed plain error by entering a judgment that did not comply with ORS 138.620 and ORS 138.640. Because error is not apparent on the face of the record, ORAP 5.45, we affirm.
Petitioner pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree sodomy, three counts of first-degree sexual abuse, and four counts of private indecency; he was sentenced to 219 months in prison. Petitioner later challenged his convictions and sentences in this case, alleging at least nine separate ways in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Guinn v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Haynes v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Meyers v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Datt v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Leahy v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Taylor v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Datt v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Datt v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008