Legal Opinion

Datt v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 25, 2008No. 05024238M; A130434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*659ARMSTRONG, J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment that denied his petition for post-conviction relief. He raises four assignments of error. Our resolution of petitioner’s fourth assignment of error, which is that the court erred in failing to enter a judgment that complied with ORS 138.640, leads us to reverse and remand the judgment on the first of two claims that petitioner pursues on appeal. We otherwise affirm the judgment.

Petitioner was convicted of five counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and one count each of criminal mistreatment in the first degree, assault in the third degree, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Barzee v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Datt v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API